≈≈ In Today’s World, What is the Role of Religion?
- Dangerous topic? Let’s see. -
If you look at the percentage of wars throughout history
fought primarily over religion, the number is surprisingly low, about 7%. That’s
not to say religion hasn’t been used as a pretense, or that it isn’t deeply
intertwined with ethnic identity, nationalism, or power. Who’s right, who’s
wrong, whose G-d is the real one, if there is one at all. Religion is woven into our culture, politics, family, and identity, so it’s impossible to fully
separate it from how we interact with one another. But, in the final analysis,
religion is statistically far from the predominant driver of conflict.
Up front: I’m a devout atheist. That puts me in a mixed
marriage, as my wife is solidly Jewish. And yes, as they say, some of my best
friends are of different faiths (although some may deny the “best” part, some
even the friend’s part). They pray differently, believe differently, and even
pray to different G‑ds. When we’re together we have conversations about a
myriad of things, honest ones, and what I’ve found is that our basic values are
remarkably similar, even when those values lead us to different conclusions.
Full disclosure: by birth and tradition, I’m Jewish. I went to Sunday school (held on Saturdays. I don’t know why, but it was a Reform temple in Brooklyn, so there’s that). And yes, for those wondering, and those who don’t care, I was Bar Mitzvah’d. so it’s not like I’m a total rookie.
Here’s the story. It dates back to the first century BCE, so
it’s had some staying power. A non‑Jew asked Hillel, a great Jewish sage, to
teach him the entire Torah while standing on one foot. Hillel replied:
“That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow.
That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary. Now go and learn it.”
The Torah—the first five books of the Bible—is shared by
Judaism and Christianity, so both embrace what later became known as the GoldenRule. Islam and Hinduism embrace it as well. Buddhism extends it even
further, from simply refraining from harm to actively wishing others well.
These traditions represent the five largest religious groups in the Country.
Atheists and “None's”, (together actually the second largest group), believe in the Golden Rule as well. Their morality isn’t rooted in divine command but in human reason, empathy, and lived experience. Treat people the way you’d want to be treated. Reduce suffering. Increase well-being. Same destination, different map.
So where am I going with this?
If we all share the same fundamental belief, why are we
fighting each other so fiercely over the same Rule? How is it possible to be in
such conflict with people who believe in essentially the same things.
Helping, not demonizing, people is what we all fundamentally
believe. That we recognize a shared humanity shouldn’t be controversial.
Whether that motivation comes from G-d, scripture, tradition, or simple human
decency, the goals are all supposed to work toward the same fundamental
outcome. A better, more compassionate world. “Do unto others”.
So it occurred to me that if we agree on the core
principles, why are our interpretations of how to apply them so wildly
different? If we all believe in “do unto others,” shouldn’t our starting point
be how we would want to be treated?
Or maybe AI is wrong and all my facts are bogus.
Personally, I think we need to start looking inward and stop
outsourcing our thinking to paid pundits. We should go back to basics and focus
on doing what’s right. Shared problems won’t be solved without shared values.
Okay—so maybe I still have a little naïveté left in me.
Thanks for reading.
Please let me know what you think at thoughts@amtify.com

Comments
Post a Comment